The Manhattan Daygame Vibe-Cuck Continuum

Women are strongly influenced by culture, and culture follows pre-set patterns.

For certain traits, including nationality, university, profession, hobby, and even footwear, there exists a strong correlation to whether a given daygame set will be cuck or vibey.

Manhattan’s most prodigious daygamers have devoted tens of thousands of hours of combined research to identify these archetypes. For years, this has been tribal knowledge, but for the first time, we are making it public.

Gentlemen, I am excited to present the Manhattan Daygame Vibe-Cuck Continuum. Hopefully it helps with what to expect from a given set in your time on the streets.

(click to embiggen)

32 thoughts on “The Manhattan Daygame Vibe-Cuck Continuum

  1. NentjeValentje

    Wow, what an analysis. Thanks bro. And thanks for making it only. Finally some really advanced stuff. Will directly use it for my daygame session today here at 34th Street Hudson Yards. When will you publish a heat map of Manhattan with girls vibe-/cuck-ness?

    Like

  2. Joe

    Professional and leisure-class women (and their au pairs) wear expensive Golden Goose/Veja or practical Blundstone/On/Hoka/NewBalance instead of mass-market Nike and faux-rebel Doc Martens. They screen men through social circle and don’t tolerate street weirdos.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. > Professional and leisure-class women (and their au pairs) wear expensive Golden Goose… they screen men through social circle and don’t tolerate street weirdos

      I dated a ton of Chinese girls in SF that rocked Golden Goose (2016-2019). They were all rich girls from China in SF, studying language or art (occasionally on vacation). I picked them all up via Daygame (street weirdo?), as an artist (at least for the art girls), and smart enoigh (not a street weirdo?) we vibed great.

      My style was black Levis and Vans, black t shirt. They were very often Gucci/LV girls. But we got along great, so many great dates.

      Fashion can mean something (it’s an EXPRESSION of her inner vision of herself)… but this chart is troll-level dumb.

      Like

      1. Joe

        Rich visitors seek fun experiences. You wore a triple-black artist uniform.

        Rich established NYC residents want the cool guy in the Hamptons. Notre Dame/Berkeley/Ivy transplants want a manager with a corner office.

        NYC has int’l and “bridge and tunnel” visitors, and exchange students from UVA, etc. It also has New School/CUNY/SUNY students and artist/performers with short-term horizons. They want to experience everything before leaving for cheaper livable places.

        Like

        1. > Rich established NYC residents want the cool guy in the Hamptons.

          Some do, yeah. SOME girls born into “status,” want status. And some, want to rebel against what they were born into. Two sisters in the same house, from the same family, want different things.

          It’s not that profile don’t exist, it’s that XYZ causes ABC is debilitating way to understand women.

          > They want to experience everything before leaving for cheaper livable places.

          Krauser used the “Map” of “does she want status, or does she want experiences?” That isn’t useful in every case, but it’s a good “map.”

          Fast sex or what Krauser used to call “Adventure Sex” appeals to girls that want experiences. Status girls have very little to gain from that. That is one way to look at which girls jump on daygame/cold approach and which do not.

          Like

          1. Joe

            XYZ causes ABC is debilitating way to understand

            Yes, because correlation is not causality, this effect varies by city. SF has rich Asian tourists who seek adventure. But NYC has rich residents who know the scene. That is why expensive shoes signify opportunity in SF, and cuck in NYC.

            Like

        1. > Style is better than university is better than nationality, but not infinitely better. There’s no Z-axis for correlation, but you can imagine one.

          Teaching guys that one is definitely a better indication of something than another, and WHY, would be helpful. 1/2 of those are so “low signal,” paying attention to them is a distraction.

          Thinking “she is from XYZ country so therefore…” is bait for a lazy, ineffectual part that exists in so many guys.

          Her COUNTRY says absolutely NOTHING about her psych or behavior – which is what you’re actually dealing with when you’re face to face with a girl. Whereas how she dresses says something about how she perceives herself, if not what she is…. yes, infinitely better.

          Like

        2. > I mean, yeah. Dating cuck girls requires being cuck. 

          This is heading in such a dumb direction, I don’t even want to know what you mean.

          This is so “name calling troll,” I am surprised you couldn’t find a way to include both “cringe” and “incel” to complete your internet trendy boy talk bingo card.

          Like

          1. Joe

            > I mean, yeah. Dating cuck girls requires being cuck.  It’s not like they don’t have sex.

            I don’t even want to know what you mean.

            I did not understand this at first.

            It sounds like Pancake does not agree with DaysOfGame’s targets or method. This reminds me of Mystery’s “fool’s mate” accusation when men has ONS’s in less than 6 hours.

            So, simmer down, DaysOfGame, and stick to the playbook. You must project a thug vibe. Being cultured and artistic is cheating, especially with rich girls. It is a crutch that will prevent you from developing real skill. Pancake knows because he has been doing this for years.

            Like

            1. > So, simmer down, DaysOfGame, and stick to the playbook. You must project a thug vibe. Being cultured and artistic is cheating, especially with rich girls. It is a crutch that will prevent you from developing real skill. Pancake knows because he has been doing this for years.

              Yeah. I’m still trying to get this. Be “thuggier.” And no, that won’t work with the girls I like to date (it will repel them), but that doesn’t matter, because those girls don’t count anyway because of ???

              #NYCisHARDER

              Next time, if you can just say it all a little slower… I’m sure it’ll make more sense.

              Thanks, Joe. Don’t give up on me, man.

              Like

  3. > For certain traits, including nationality

    No. Dumbest “map” ever to judge girls. Anything geo-based that isn’t an indication of behavior, is a braindead path to nowhere.

    “NYC is the hardest place ever because it’s NYC” Pancake’s favorite cliff to jump off (over and over).

    > university

    As in “did go/didn’t go,” maybe. As in XYZ vs ABC, almost certainly not.

    > profession, hobby, and even footwear, there exists a strong correlation to whether a given daygame set will be cuck or vibey.

    Yes, profession, hobby, and footwear(/style) DO (or may) show something about the girl.

    POP QUIZ: Why is something like STYLE a fundamentally different and infinitely better predictor than “nationality” of what a girl might be like?

    If you don’t get it… you don’t understand much about people.

    Like

    1. “White Man God Mode” is a clue that you might a thing for white guys (one that most Asian girls don’t actually have). Jeff likes white dudes. Got it.

      (These guys would have a better grasp of the SMP if they would first go to Asia and rack up a bunch a “easy lays” before they repeat their “internet truffs.” If they could see the “white guys” here, and how they’re not particularly attractive (why would they be?), nor doing well here (why would they be?), they’d have to take their “white boy crush theories” someplace else.)

      (If you want to go beyond Jeff’s level of basic: There is some truth to guys getting laid in countries with **low GDP**. But then, that has nothing to do with “Asian” – unless we’re talking Thailand/Cambodia/etc – and (of course) applies equally well to Cuba/Columbia/Mexico – because those girls don’t share Jeff’s fetish for white guys; they are after the cash, because economics has explanatory power… unless you a little bit geh for white guys, then by all means, please tell on yourself.)

      Like

      1. Jeff

        I’m sorry but this is true. Classic scenario for daygamers actually getting laid with high value girls: had a bit of a dry spell, let’s throw in an asian in east mood just to get momentum.

        Krauser mentions it at some point…. if you are on the spectrum go for asian girls because their social awareness is so low they won’t notice. They lack the acuity and reading skills to detect low value traits. So sorry, if you bang mainly chinese/korean/thai girls that is not game…

        Like

        1. Flute

          Krauser ran away to Eastern Europe because he couldn’t get laid in London. Why would anyone quote the autistic cuck.

          Asian girls are more forgiving, not because of social acuity, but because they don’t have the same worldview as western women. So, they do not auto-reject men based on specific looks.

          Note how there’s a distinct difference between westernized Asian girls, and native Asian girls. The westernized ones are the same as any other race of western girl.

          Like

          1. > Krauser ran away to Eastern Europe because he couldn’t get laid in London

            Except he did get laid in London. Over and over. He was a coach for Daygame.com. And then he got laid almost everywhere he went, predictably. And ended up w/ 160+ laycount.

            So I know why HE has authority. But you… I’m not sure why anyone cares what you think.

            > Asian girls are more forgiving, not because of social acuity, but because they don’t have the same worldview as western women.

            You guys… with your “internet dreams” about what Asia is like. 

            I live in Japan. You know what a hot Shibuya girl thinks of this idea… nothing. She walks right past you. (Just like hot girls every where.) She’s hot. She has options. Her “Asian-ness” isn’t what matters. You’re cool, or you’re not… that is what matters… every where.

            You’re doing theory right now. Lame, made up theory.

            Come to a party district in Japan… and you’ll see “party girls” in Asia are like “party girls anywhere.” They don’t “accept you” because of their “world view.” That is goofy internet POV. They know you’re a stranger, and that you “want something.” That is the same everywhere.

            I’m not guessing. I have been Gaming in Asia for over 10 years. I have 100s of approaches, dated >100 Asian girls. 

            Krauser has authority. I have authority.

            Talk about what you know. Maybe you know something, but you’re dead in the water on these topics. And anyone with FIRST HAND EXPERIENCE knows it.

            Liked by 1 person

            1. Flute

              Most of Krauser’s lays came from Eastern Europe during the early days of daygame, as did most of the British daygame guys. They all rocked up to non-western countries and played the charming British chap LARP, banged a bunch of 5s and 6s and called it ‘game’. Full on autistic circle jerk of PUA community and coaching content.

              Even when they did get laid in London, almost all of the lays were with non-UK girls or Eastern European girls. I don’t know who you are, but I am guessing you are another one of these charming British guy LARPers banging foreign girls.

              I am nobody. But I have dated in London and also in Asia for extensive periods, and it all makes perfect sense. Non-western girls (Asian in this case), have a different worldview, as do Eastern European girls, to western girls, so they have different preferences in their men.

              You see it when looking at the local couples, hot Asian girls with average looking local Asian men. Hot EE women with average EE men. It doesn’t happen in a place like London, all western women date UP.

              I am speaking from first hand experience and also observations of the dating scene for over a decade. You daygame charlatans had a good run.

              Like

              1. Lmao, as a guy who lives in the west (US) in a pretty sizeable city, I can attest that hot girls and mediocre guys are commonplace as couples.

                It’s funny you put Nash in the LDM bucket, he’s from the US as well.

                Like

                1. Flute

                  Sounds like you are way overestimating the attractiveness of average girls, like a lot of guys do in this space.

                  Average guy with hot girl is incredibly rare in the west. If it were commonplace, then the whole pick up or game scene would not exist – as getting girls would be easy lol. Most dudes struggle hard in the west.

                  Like

  4. Pingback: Saturday, March 23, 2024 – New York City – Pancake Mouse Field Reports

  5. Pingback: Sunday, April 7, 2024 – New York City – Pancake Mouse Field Reports

  6. Joe

    On second thought, your chart has mostly athletic shoes. What about loafers, moccasins, ballerina flats, sandals, Espadrilles, clogs, mules, wedges, ankle boots, pumps, or stilettos? You can find women with better shoe style, especially in NYC!

    Like

  7. Pingback: Tuesday, April 23, 2024 – New York City – Pancake Mouse Field Reports

Leave a comment